Games PC, gold in virtual currency. Is the console the answer in 2018?

Among the platforms to play in the Korean market are the PC, which has been the mainstream since the past year, and the console platform, which has been growing quite a bit since the beginning of the spotlight last year.

On the console platform, Sony’s PS3 (PRO) and Microsoft’s XBOX ONE (S, X) are available, and Nintendo switch released late last year is popular.

In order to play the game in earnest now, it is common to choose either a PC or a console device.

However, as a matter of choice, PCs and consoles for the game have their respective pros and cons, and there are quite a few points to consider.

So, as of 2018, I’ll be taking the time to talk about platforms, PCs, or consoles and the content and performance to choose between them.

The most basic problem for those who are worrying about whether to play games is the price.

Considering the cost, the PC side is said to be at a slight disadvantage as of 2018.

The price of graphics cards, which affect the performance of games, has soared, especially since the company has already covered the relevant issues several times in the Cavench.

At least the NVIDIA GTX 1060GB has to be priced at 60 frame level for games like the Battle Ground that are popular these days to operate smoothly at least 30 frame level, despite the fact that they are largely caused by the boom in virtual currencies.

At this price, you can buy a console at the price of a single graphics card.

Of course, if you include CPU, mainboard, memory, graphics cards, etc. besides graphics cards, gaming PCs are very difficult to compare to consoles in terms of price at this point.

Even if one decorates gaming PCs at a low price, it will cost at least 600,000 won, and at the average cost of 700,000 to 800,000 won is now a high-end gaming PC.

The console, on the other hand, is the best season to attract gamers. The console costs 600,000 won at most recently released high-end models.

For Sony PS4, the basic Slim version is 370,000 won, and the Performance UP version is 490,000 won, with the exception of other discount stores.

Similarly, Microsoft’s XBox ONE also supports a resolution of 350,000 won and 4K, and the XBOX ONE X is 570,000 won.

Nintendo switch costs 360,000 won. All these prices are exclusion-exclusive, making them cheaper to buy if you include a variety of discounts and promotions.

In conclusion, if you just want to play games at a price you’ll find it cheaper to buy consoles.

But if you look at the price, you may think so. Isn’t it possible for PCs to play games better and better quality than consoles anyway? as

In these days, it is popular to release the same game on both PC and console. (Some games are released on a proprietary platform, but this is described later)

Considering the price-to-performance aspect, it is undeniable that the PC usually leads the game depending on the game. However, if game developers are to release both the console and PC, they must carry out each optimization and setting that is suitable for the platform.

On a PC, a variety of specification options can be modified by the user, on a high specification the high equality can be seen, on a low specification console the low equality can be set on a low specification.

As a result, although PC is a good choice for the game’s top visual display when it is released, it is very unlikely that the console will be provided with a game of a lower quality than that seen on a lower quality PC.

Talking about it again at a price point, the console is definitely much cheaper than the gaming PC. Since it is true that the standard is not as high as the high-end PC, it can be lacking in performance and quality compared to the high-end gaming PC.

However, it is also said that game developers can ensure superior quality and performance while making it optimized for the fixed specifications of the console. It is easier to optimize for a fixed specification than for a fragmented specification.

After all, it is cheaper to choose between PCs that are as high-quality as investment, but a console that can not be guaranteed the quality that complies with the specifications is better.

Choice can be said to be based on price and performance, the style you want.

■ Differences between keyboard, mouse, and game pad

Performance and quality are important, but game play style is also important.

Lately, the boundary may be a blurred area, but it can not help but pick up the interface part that plays the game.

The PC usually plays with a keyboard and mouse, a joystick on the console, and a pad called a game-bag now.

Whereas the PC allows you to connect the console’s game pad to play with the same interface as the console, the console generally focuses on the keyboard and mouse connection, making the console game more forward.

Due to these differences, if you find it difficult to adjust the game pad to the console, compared to the keyboard and mouse, consider choosing a console.

My personal thoughts are that playing games on both sides of the PC and console, and I think it makes me feel more interested in the genre of the game and the fun associated with the kerma (keyboard mouse) and game pad.

While we talked about price and performance earlier, the most important thing is what games and content to play.

As I mentioned for a moment, it is common for games to be released on both the PC and the console. But there are still exceptions.

Some game developers are supported by their respective console developers to release the briefly mentioned ” Exclusive Platform Game. ”

Sony and Nintendo often play these exclusive games. Sony and Nintendo have several developers on their own to guide users onto their console platforms as the exclusive game with higher quality gaming capabilities.

Typically, Sony . is famous for many of its First Party developers. For instance, there are the Last of Earth, the War, and the Uncharted series.

Nintendo is featuring a party game console and the Zelda’s legendary Bress of the Wild, along with its capabilities as a handheld on the recently released Nintendo switch.

The behavior of Microsoft XBOX’s team is somewhat unusual. Although it only plays exclusive games on XBOBs, it services the stores to share with the PCs, but also offers exclusive games on the PC through its Windows 10 store.

On the contrary, it is recognized as a barrier to the benefits of the XBOX console’s ownership, making it both gain and loss.

On the other hand, while only the keyboard and mouse show exclusive games that are easy to play, recently the monopoly on PC games is rarely found.

It would be best to have all the platforms (?) if we consider these days of exclusive games, but we don’t usually have that kind of situation.

Therefore, it is necessary to check and choose what game content is released on the PC, consoles and not just the performance and price.

So, right now, I would like to give my personal thoughts to a direct reader who asks, ” What the hell do you like to choose? ”

If you have the money to spend on a high-end PC, of course, you can enjoy the most games.

Also, if you have a high performance PC, the exclusive games on the XBox platform may be a far cry from purchasing the XBOX ONE console because it can be purchased and played through Windows 10 stores.

On the other hand, if you don’t have a PC or have a low-capacity PC to play with, the choice of XBOX ONE X is the best choice for price/performance.

Not only is it possible to play multI-platform games, but it also has the same performance as a high-end PC.

If you want to play games that are not easily seen on a PC, the PS4 is the right place to play. More games are available with the PS 4 only each year, especially as the Korean version is frequently applied exclusively by Korean standards, allowing users to enjoy a variety of exclusive games and games in Korean.

There are disadvantages to having only a PS4. It is because although there is a version of the high performance Pro compared to PC or XBox ONE X, it is likely to feel insufficient compared to PC or XBOX ONE X in the performance and quality area. In particular, the frame and resolution related areas are large.

Nintendo’s Nintendo switch feels a little more like a PC versus console option. The unique thing is that it can be used as a portable without the need for a separate display, and it is a combination of a solo and a multI-story piece.(As of 2018, even that is still lacking)

In addition, most games offered are rather cute, and with the exception of some games, the quality and scale of the games are still lacking compared to the games found on traditional consoles and PCs.

 

I’m finally out! Z 370 boda tamguest 300 Series Chipsets Only Explore the charm

With the advent of ” Battle Ground, ” many people are thinking about buying or upgrading PCs. However, the reality is that not many people have actually changed or upgraded their PCs, only to be concerned about the high price of them.

As the price of virtual currencies soared, graphics cards that had all been drawn into the mining market became gold, and Intel’s eighth-generation core processor, driven by competition for core numbers, was naturally hampered by the higher price of the main board.

Fortunately, as the price of virtual currencies has dropped dramatically in recent years, the price of graphics cards, which used to boast of gold, has begun to decline as the mining market is facing a crisis.

We still have a long way to go, but that is a matter of time before Intel made the decision, and one more piece of good news was added yesterday.

Instead of the 370 .0 chipset main board, it is now officially marketed by the main board, which is capable of completing the eighth-generation core PC at a lower price.

From now on, I would like to introduce in detail about this product, which is the completion of the 300-series chipset.

As anyone knows, the 370 .00 chipset was originally not intended to come in 300 series.

It is normal that it should not have been.

However, as AMD begins to compete for the number of cores with its Lizen processor, Intel will also be forced to respond with a hexacone containing six CPU cores, making it a pressing drive for the .20 Series.

It is Intel’s position that it could not be helped to support hexacore, but it has been shown by several board partners and a modified BIOS developer to work with .27 Series chipset boards.

Although Intel may have released a new chipset for the generations to come, the eighth generation core processor is the only choice made by some high-end users, but it finally revealed the proper 300-series chipset.

Yesterday, the 300-series chipset makers are the ones that are in its lower lineup than the 370 .0, which was released earlier.

There are four types of products, the H .0, ,60, and H3100`s, but the most common model is also PCI Express 3.0 Lane, or USB 3.1 Gen 2 ports.

So, with the exception of . 3700, man60, and H30`s only made up of the main boards, they are supplied to the general consumer market for the purpose of assembling eighth-generation core PCs.

While there are insufficient PCI Express Lane and the number of .M-enabled PCIe storage that do not support overclock, they all have USB 3.1 Gen 2 and 802.11 ac WiFi capabilities built into them.

The reason is that the 370 .0 is not the 300-series chipset that it was originally planned for.

It is not just smart phones or tablets that use wireless networks. From smart enabled TVs to AV receivers, to speakers and various IOT devices, most devices are designed to use wireless.

Except for one, the desktop PC.

Even desktop PCs are not unfamiliar with wireless networks. Already, a combo feature has been provided that integrates WiFi and BT (Bluetooth) based on the advanced main board. On the main PC board, however, the wireless network was merely a means to raise the body value, but it was not meant to proactively respond to changes in the network environment.

In this situation, Intel has incorporated WiFi features into processors to increase their impact on the market as they accelerated the shift toward wireless network environments.

Of all the logic to realize WiFi network, all but the RF module, which is required for actual data transmission and transmission, are integrated into the SOC.

If this works, PC makers that have used broadband and other controllers are forced to use their products, making Intel more influential in the market. It is almost a monopoly system, but the integrated WiFi features have not yet been expanded, beginning with the 300 Series Chipsets released this time.

With the exception of 37037, all 300 Series Chipsets are equipped with a CN . solution that enables WiFi wireless network to be implemented by attaching only RF modules.

The Bluetooth and 802.11 accesswork wireless networks can be implemented only by installing the Intel-Provide Radio-AC9560, 9462, and 9561 RF Module. It is also the fastest among 802.11 actions, and the latest version is Wave 2.

As a result, WiFi wireless network, which is implemented as a CN . solution, is capable of increasing the speed of 5GHz to 1.73Gbps, which was the limit of 866 Mbps, using a fixed channel bandwidth of 160 MHz.

The actual speed varies depending on the antenna configuration, but 1.73Gbps can be achieved using the Intel AC-95600Mbps RF module, which consists of a .R configuration.

Of course, if you want to use. 802.11 accus. Wave 2, you’ll also need to support wireless routers with 802.11 acrobaction 2. Otherwise, 802.11 acrover 2 has no meaning.

USB 3.1 Gen 2, capable of implementing 10 Gbps, is not the same as USB 3.1, as is often said. The USB 3.1 mentioned is not the Gen 1, which is a 5 Gbps version, which is equivalent to USB 3.0. So it has been hoped to be fully distinguished from USB 3.1 Gen 2, which is twice as fast, and the main board manufacturer has stressed such differences and added more costs to its products.

Intel’s USB has been forced to accept the demand for the 10 Gbps USB 3.1 Gen 2 since it has a 5 Gbps capacity, but it no longer has to incur additional costs.

As mentioned earlier, the 300-series chipset has a built-in 10 Gbps USB 3.1 Gen 2 feature. Even though it excludes low-value models such as 31010, both 370 modu0 and 36060 are capable of configuring four ports of 10 .B USB 3.1 Gen 2.

The actual number of USB ports allowed will be calculated by combining Gen 1 and Gen 2, so the number of tolerance for 10Gbps USB 3.1 Gen 2 will inevitably vary depending on the mainboard manufacturer’s policy. Some may be all four or some may only be two.

At any rate, since the 10 Gbps USB 3.1 Gen 2 is available at the PCH level, it is likely to be able to reduce the cost burden on it, and to rely on external controllers rather than on the way they are built in.

As 300-series chipset that has implemented USB 3.1 Gen 2 for 802.11 achiev-integrated WiFi feature, there is no reason to insist on the 370 . chipsset0 chipset. Since it is cheaper and has implemented better features, no one can choose the 370 .00 chipset.

I agree with some of the opinions, but I don’t think it is time to talk about the danmyeong .0’s short-lived existence.

The .70 chipset still has the overclock, which is only available in the Z series. The value of Z Series alone can not be denied, as it can bring better performance not only with K skew, but also with base clock control, which has loose drainage limits.

Rather, the .20, the only chipset before they are able to continue to realize its value, is that it is an overclock that is bound to override the 802.11 access-integrated WiFi or USB 3.1 Gen 2.

For your information, the husok .0 successor is known to be released later this year and is more likely to come with Octacore. The recently leaked data confirmed the name of the .90 chipset.

Intel, which introduced eighth-generation core processors last fall, did not release the full lineup. As the previous generation had to exhaust its current capacity and should endure as one for the time being, it maintained the eighth-generation core line-up based on high-end models such as the K-views, but added a desktop processor to be introduced yesterday as eighth-generation core.

Intel has decided to add six TDP 35W low-power models and three standard models. Of these, the three general models that will be introduced into the general desktop PC market will play a role as waistlines for each line up previously entered.

The top three model types, Core .- model00, are sub-model of the hexahedr-core CPU released last year, core I8600K. Its number is the same, and its maximum speed is the same at 4.3 GHz.

Since it is priced at 44 dollars, it is much more expensive than the K-Spubo model except for the Oberclock.

Core .-5000, which is higher in performance than core I-0440, was also introduced, which had the lowest price advantage. The model is capable of operating up to 4.1 GHz with a turboff of 3GHz and turboff, so 2.8 GHz delivers higher performance than the base clock, .-048040.

However, the difference in price between the two products is only $ 10, so it is expected that the company will share the demand created by the core .-0440 but will not generate significant synergy effects.

Lastly, the only model to be introduced on the core I- .00 is the core I eun0, which is slower than the 8350 K released on the K skew, but it is also 100 MB faster than the bottom 2 models (8100). It is 21 dollars higher than the 8100 and 30 dollars cheaper than the 8350 K, making it an ambiguous product considering the cost of housing.

 

Small peppers are spicy, Aenobia Inno3D Gipos GTX 1070 TI Ti 8 GB teuwin twin cooler.

The GeForce GTX 1070 Timegraphic Card, launched by Envidea, must have been released to check AMD’s Pega 56 graphics card.

The Pega 56 product was then a grey line to compete in India. Performance and price. At the end of the day, the choice was to release the GeForce GTX 1070, which was located in the middle of the GeForce GTX 1070, and would easily get close to GTX 1080 performance.

In response, the company will ban the factory OC. Even the AIB partners in Envidea could no longer differentiate their non-referencing products through the Factory OC.

Fortunately, it does not block software overshoots to increase performance depending on the user’s settings. However, since an overclock naturally increases GPU heating, it is necessary to provide cooling performance to support it.

As a result, Envidea’s partners have introduced a variety of GeForce GTX 1070 Tipperlanes with enhanced cooling capabilities, especially the Inno 3D, which is strongly supported by the company’s ” Ice Shelf Systems. ”

Today we’ll take the time to look at the new GeForce GTX 1070 Timegraphs Cards available on Inno 3D.

The new Inno 3D GeForce GTX 1070 ti . GB teuwin twin cooler graphics card is short for the design of the existing X2 graphics card, but it is shorter at 266 millimeters. Considering that it is a high-performance GTX 1070 tipperset, it is a very short way.

It is considered a product that will relieve anxiety to users who can not fit high performance graphics cards because of its wide width using ITX cases or small-sized cases.

As the overall design is compact and neat black, I think it is a product that everyone will like externally.

Compact graphics cards tend to be disadvantageous to heat control, but the Inno 3D GeForce GTX 1070 TIB 8 GB X2 twin cooler graphics card uses a Herzul . bearing to enhance the cooling performance.

 

Inno 3D GeForce GTX 1070 TIB 8 GB X2 twin cooler graphics card shows a solid internal configuration for heating control.

Big hit thinking panels that cover the board are equipped with two additional heat pipes to increase the efficiency of heat generation, while the board’s power panel has individual internal control over the heat source.

The configuration of the power unit in Step 5-1 is considered very stable, and internal memory modules can not be questioned about performance and durability using Micron’s memory.

 

NBC GTX 1070 Timegraph cards are definitely capable of threatening the GTX 1080, the top chipset.

Because of this, GTX 1070 TIs all have a core clock that is limited to the base clock 1607 MHz, the boost clock 1683 MHz, and the core clock can not be adjusted in the drivers that Envidea has built in.

However, using tuning software from each partner, it is possible to force an overclock, and I was able to launch it using the ” afterburner ” software from MSI.

The power limit was raised to its maximum, and the core clock was set to 1757 MHz at the base clock and 1833 MHz at the boost clock.

 

It is true that overclock performance is close to GeForce GTX 1080. The Fire-Strike and Time Spy tests offered by 3D Mark showed a marked improvement in the performance of Oberclock, and scored close to the GeForce GTX 1080 FE model.

I tested the ” Battle Ground ” and ” Rise of the Tomb ” radar for the performance tests that have recently become popular with the Final Fantasy 15 Benchmark Program, which is drawing attention from many PC users to test real-world performance.

When we measured the performance, we could see the potential for overclocking on GTX 1070times chipset as a whole. Overclock has shown significant performance improvements. Real game performance is also comparable to that of the GTX 1080 reference model, a weight class.

Of course, GTX 1070times are highly capable without the need of overclock. Battleground and Rise of the Tomb radar measure game performance at FHD resolution, but they are also a high-end version of the game performance if they applied the ” Ultra”and ” Very High ” option presets.

■ What about cooling performance?

Inno 3D GeForce GTX 1070 Time .B X2 twin cooler graphics card is certainly a high-performance graphics card. There is no doubt about it. However, it is useless even if its cooling capability is poor.

Personally, I think cooling performance is important. Accordingly, the company will conduct a simple cooling test to check the cooling performance of the Inno 3D GeForce GTX 1070 Titan 8 GB X2 twin cooler.

 

He used Furmark’s benchmark program, which makes full use of GPU usage available for cool testing.

The children’s temperature was 15 minutes after the computer booted, and the ambient temperature was measured 10 minutes after the purmack test.

Basically, the children’s temperature was very good, and if it was below a certain temperature, they would not be able to feel any noise when surfing the web or doing simple work because they would not automatically be able to be driven by a fan.

In the full-loaded environment, it rose to a maximum of 92 when setting up an overclock. However, the temperature dropped to 91 degrees Celsius and stabilized.

At first glance, it may seem like a very high temperature, but it isn’t. Since the Purmak GPU Stress Test creates a harsh environment in which GPU utilization exceeds 98 percent, it is measured warmer than the actual game consoles. The base clock also recorded 82 degrees in the Purmak Stress Test, which is a very good performance considering the short length of the graphics card and the cooling solution.

In addition, all of the IC parts that are essentially mounted on graphics cards and CPU processors are designed to withstand high temperatures of over 100 degrees, providing durability at temperatures below 100 degrees Celsius.

Users of ITX systems or PC systems using mini-cases are concerned about fitting high-performance gaming PCs.

High performance graphics cards can not be mounted on ITX or Mini-PC systems as the heat output increases in proportion to the performance, making them too large to absorb the heat.

At this point, Innovia’s Innoves GTX 1070 TIB 8 GB X2 twin cooler products are 212mm long, but it contains an outer bracket length of 212mm. In addition, GTX 1070times have excellent performance using the chipset and with the cooling that complies with it makes it a very reasonable choice for users of ITX and Mini-PC systems.

 

Mini-PC System, if it is small, is it really convenient?

In recent years, there have been many cases where more than one computer is built into the house. While traditional desktop PCs are typically the most popular, some users may prefer smaller systems, such as bare-bones and HTPC.

The mini-PC system has continued to gain traction with its users, and it has come in many forms, including ” ITX ” and ” Beibon PC. ”

In particular, mini-PC, which gradually became smaller, were also called ” hand-sized PCs, ” and were frequently used as sub-PC devices other than main PCs.

However, Mini-PC is so small that it is hard to expect high performance. It is used for simple work and multimedia viewing, but other home appliances are also located in an ambiguous position by providing similar features.

Kabenzhi plans to explore the mini-PC system and check out the weak points and threads.

Usually, PCs use a large desktop PC. However, some users are still uncomfortable with the size or limitations of space due to the large size of the PC. Some users use laptops instead of desktop PCs, but this is also inconvenient.

It is because the laptop screen is so small that it still occupies a large amount of space when the external monitor is used or when the external keyboard or mouse is connected.

So it is the mini-PC product that is starting to attract attention. In particular, tablet PCs, which were expected to cope with PC development, could not affect the traditional PC market, and professional PC makers released a variety of mini-PC products through changes.

Of course, mini-PC hasn’t come out of nowhere. In the past, when assembled PCs became popular, a small PC was distributed as a type of Beibon PC, which sold the casing, main board, CPU, and other parts in the form of a complete product.

Many people thought that the ” mini-PC ” model was used by only some manias before and after 2010. The biggest reason is that the price and performance are small, but neither performance nor price can be compared to a typical desktop PC. At that time, most people thought that a good general desktop PC was better than a expensive one.

However, when Intel’s Haswell architecture was introduced, the situation reversed itself. In general, mini-PC has not even been able to play high resolution video images, let alone 3D game drives, but Haswell processors have developed into big-sized 3D games and multimedia video clips.

Since then, gaming PCs with external GPU are also on the market due to steady developments in technology.

Mini-PC systems are basically released equipped with Bluetooth and Wi-Fi capabilities. The combination of a hand-sized PC, a wireless Bluetooth keyboard, and a mouse is a good way to use space without messy cables.

For this reason, the mini PC is intended to be used with the main body of the mini PC on the side of the monitor. But there is something you should not overlook.

It is important to remember that mini-PC systems are hard to run high performance games smoothly due to the limitations of form factor, so desktop PCs are better for gaming purposes, and 4K content is harder to enjoy after a while.

Currently, most mini-PC products support HDMI 1.4 cables, making it difficult for any user using 4K resolution monitors to fully use their functions. HDMI 1.4 cables support 4K image output itself, but they can also be frustrating in a PC environment by providing injection rates of up to 30 Hz with low data bandwidth.

Nor is HDCP2.2 certification supported. Though it is not easy to watch Blu-ray Disc through mini-PC, it is impossible to enjoy 4K contents provided by Netflix, which is becoming popular on video streaming platforms. It can not be played back properly, but it can only be seen with degraded image quality.

As a result, mini-PC products can be used for simple paperwork, for light video clips, for listening to music, and for office applications, but traditional notebook PCs can be used more efficiently if they are carried around with them. Mini PCs require the connection of monitors and other peripheral devices such as a keyboard and mouse. When thinking about power cables and other things, mini-PC devices will be much more inconvenient than laptops.

In particular, if you plug USB into smart TV sets or set-top boxes, you can easily watch multimedia content such as movies or dramas, so a mini PC system is not required.

Smart TV products have been supporting Netflix streaming apps basically. Moreover, since HDCP 2.2 is inherently supported, it is also possible to view 4K images without problems, and if the TV is equipped with 4K HDR, it is more useful on the TV side because it supports HDMI 2.0 or 2.1 standards.

The idea is that it is difficult to find any identity in using the mini-PC system. Currently, it lacks the performance to replace the main desktop PC, has a laptop PC for mobility and convenience, and makes smart TVs more useful for multimedia viewing purposes.

Currently, the use of mini-PC is in doubt. Due to the limitations of the form factor, it is not capable of being used as a high-end gaming PC. Simple casual games are easy to run without problems, but poor performance in high-end games.

Of course, the mini-PC product is also aware of its lack of gaming capabilities and is about to make up for it by releasing a product equipped with an external GPU. However, these products are so difficult to handle that they are called low-capacity, low-capacity notebook gaming processors that have relatively reduced performance and speed, rather than the standard desktop processors.

Is there any way to compensate for the poor gaming performance of mini-PC? On reflection, one alternative comes to mind. It is a product called the ‘ gaming box, ‘ which is designed to protect the poor gaming performance of laptops.

Gamebox is a mini-case equipped with a cooling solution and is designed to connect to laptops and other computers that may lack gaming performance to enable the use of external graphics cards.

It can also be used to get sufficient gaming performance from mini-PC, which lacked graphics card performance. It may be a little larger, but I think it is of sufficient size to compare it to a standard desktop PC and may be a solution for users who are concerned about insufficient gaming performance.

Recently, the manufacturers of mini-PC products have been keen on making the most of themselves and increasing hardware specifications. However, even if it is small and has high performance, it is difficult to say it has the charm inherent in the product.

Also, the features offered by mini-PC are not considered part of the reason why there are so many products already being used by users or available alternatives.

Overcoming this requires that consumers have the special charm to purchase this product rather than focus on its size or hardware specification. For instance, even if it is launched with the mini PC-Games box platform, which shares the ecosystem with the aforementioned gaming box products, and prepares a system to replace desktop PCs with a 3.5-inch version of the HDD.

In mini-PC, NAS solutions will be able to offer superior price-to-performance advantages over low-value NAS products equipped with embedded processors, and only with software support, they can be used simultaneously by both PC and NAS users.

As a result, manufacturers must think about the new mini-PC platform that stimulates consumers ‘ appetite to buy, rather than focusing on the size and hardware specifications of mini-PC.

 

Home Life Display Special Issue A gaming monitor that is in competition with speed, is it all good?

The gaming monitor market has grown in size because it improved the screen refresh rate, which has been fixed at 60 Hz for a long time.

With the introduction of products that are capable of updating screens at higher speeds, such as 120 Hz and 144 Hz, consumers have experienced smooth movements in their wallets that they could not see on conventional monitors.

Recently, a monitor supporting 165 Hz appeared to create a mood that is like a speed race, but I would like to talk a few words about it today.

It is true that the core of a gaming monitor is its speed, or Hz.

It is also true that a higher screen refresh rate means a smoother movement, so a higher Hz should be recognized as a higher quality product than a lower product.

However, high Hz does not necessarily make the movements smoother.

More Hz is meaningless if the monitor does not implement the ADE as fast as it is supported by the screen. If you connect a 120-Hz gaming monitor to a PC that is also difficult to use in the game, only mouse cursor movement and window movement will be smooth.

Therefore, to make good use of the gaming monitor, you must upgrade your PC to enable randering to fit on the straight Hz.

If upgrading a PC is difficult, it is a wise choice to focus on the higher frequency than a higher Hz monitor unconditionally. Even if you purchase products with a higher Hz, you will feel a smaller difference. I want to stop paying more for the number play.

Upgrading PC performance does not make all screens smoother. Content produced on the PC itself can be enlarged to match the playback rate of the screen, and can also be set at a certain rate, but it can not be made on a video that is already set to speed.

At least, it is necessary to fall directly to the bottom of the screen, if not 1:1, to prevent this phenomenon.

So I recommend a 120 Hz monitor rather than a 144 Hz one.

While 120Hz monitors are capable of playing low-framed, low-framed, or low-framed video, 14 .Hz monitors are capable of producing only 30p or 60p frame drops.

Of course, a 144 Hz monitor may also be less likely to be understood if the problem is addressed by changing the screen refresh rate from 120 Hz to 120 Hz, although it is a less significant area to consider.

AMD Fluid motion is a technology that creates a frame that is lacking for higher screen playback than the original image. AMD claims that using this technology not only allows for a smoother movement than the original, but also solves the problem of the other ones.

However, it is known to not be very effective on gaming monitors over 120 Hz as it was developed for 60 Hz monitors.

Even if you turn on fluid-motion, it makes little difference to those phenomena at 144 Hz. It feels better to just change the setting to 120 Hz.

It may be a psychological effect, but while it felt a little smoother with one movement active at 120 Hz, it did not seem to solve the fundamental problems with the 144 Hz monitor.